Strategi Nilai-Nilai Kebangsaan Berbasis UUD 1945 Pasa Diversifikasi Ekonomi Untuk Mengurangi Ketergantungan Pada Sektor Migas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/apke.v1i2.134Keywords:
Oil and Gas Trade, Oil and Gas and Non-Oil Exports, Indonesia Economic ImplicationsAbstract
In an effort to reduce economic dependence on the oil and gas sector, the country needs to diversify through various policies such as infrastructure investment, fiscal policies that support non-oil and gas sectors, education and training for skilled labor, research and innovation, export promotion, international partnerships, wise management of natural resources, support for SMEs, public-private partnerships, and continuous evaluation. Economic diversification is considered essential to achieve sustainable economic growth and to be resilient to fluctuations in world oil prices. Oil and gas trade, non-oil and gas exports, and foreign investment play a crucial role in Indonesia's economy. Economic diversification and the development of alternative energy sources are key to mitigating the economic risks associated with oil price fluctuations. Although challenges and constraints exist, the long-term benefits of economic diversification are vital for economic stability and sustainable growth. Oil and gas trade has a significant impact on Indonesia's economy, contributing significantly to state revenues but is also vulnerable to fluctuations in oil and gas prices in the global market. Therefore, economic diversification is an important strategy to reduce the economic risks associated with dependence on the oil and gas sector. This study aims to provide a deeper understanding of the dynamics of oil and gas trade and its impact on the Indonesian economy.
Downloads
References
Aswicahyono, H., & Hill, H. (2007). Productive inefficiency in Indonesian manufacturing. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies.
Auty, R. . (1993). Sustaining development in the mineral economies: The resource curse thesis. Routledge.
Brekke, T., Holmoy, E., & Straume, H. . (2018). The Norwegian economy and the Dutch disease. CESifo Economic Studies.
Collier, P., & Goderis, B. (2007). Commodity prices, growth, and the natural resource curse: Reconciling a conundrum. CEPR Discussion Paper.
CordenW.M ; Neary J.P. (1982). Booming sector and de-industrialization in a small open economy. The Economic Journal, 92, 825–848.
Davis, G. (1995). Learning to love the Dutch disease: Evidence from the mineral economies. World Development, 29, 2111–2126.
Eicher, T. S., & Henn, C. (2011). nstitutions and economic performance: Endogeneity and parameter heterogeneity. European Economic Review.
Gelb, A. . (1988). Windfall gains: Blessing or curse? World Development.
Hill, H. (2019). Indonesia’s experience with export-oriented industrialization, 1970-2016. Asian Economic Policy Review.
Lim, L., & Lim, K. (2003). Singapore’s industrialization and economic development. Asean Economic Bulletin.
Low, L. (2007). Globalization, economic policy, and the automotive industry: The Southeast Asian experience. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra‐industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica.
Rasiah, R. G., & Gachino, G. (2015). Technological change, production reorganization, and labor productivity growth in Singapore. The Developing Economies.
Ross, M. L. (1999). The political economy of the resource curse. World Politics.
T.S, E., Mogstad, M., & Zafar, B. (2019). Educational assortative mating and household income inequality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Akuntansi Pajak dan Kebijakan Ekonomi Digital
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.