Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Perubahan Kebijakan Jam Kerja Tenaga Kependidikan dengan Pendekatan Teori Penerimaan terhadap Otoritas

Stefanus Khrismasagung Trikusumaadi; Noviana Dewi

doi:10.61132/apke.v2i4.1756

Authors

Stefanus Khrismasagung Trikusumaadi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Nasional
Noviana Dewi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Nasional

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/apke.v2i4.1756

Keywords:

Acceptance Of Authority, Administrative Staff, Compliance, Violation Levels, Working Hours

Abstract

Changes in working-hour policies can bring both positive and negative impacts to an organization. At a private university, the implementation of such a policy has generated noticeable reactions among employees, particularly administrative staff who are directly affected by daily operational regulations. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the revised working-hour policy, specifically how it is understood, practiced, and accepted by administrative personnel. In addition, the study examines the relationship between employees’ acceptance of the policy and Barnard’s theory of acceptance of authority, which emphasizes four conditions that must be met for individuals to willingly comply with directives or regulations. The results show that violations of the working-hour policy fall into the low category at 64%, medium at 24%, and high at only 12%. These findings indicate that the majority of administrative staff still attempt to comply with the policy despite adjustments that may be perceived as burdensome. Among the four conditions supporting compliance according to Barnard, the belief that the policy does not conflict with personal goals was found to have a significant relationship with the level of violation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.304 and a significance value of 0.032. This suggests that the greater the alignment between the policy and individual goals, the lower the likelihood of violation. Future studies are needed to convert violation rates into compliance measures so that the direction of the correlation can be interpreted more accurately.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bagian Sumber Daya Manusia, S. T. I. K. N. (2025). Transkrip hasil diskusi dengan dosen dan tendik yang tidak memenuhi ketentuan jam kerja.

Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive (30th Anniv.). Harvard University Press.

Chassagnon, V., Baudry, B., & Haned, N. (2022). The legacy of Chester I. Barnard in the science of organization of Oliver E. Williamson. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 29(3), 480–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2021.2019295

Clercq, D. De. (2023). The damage of deference: How personal and organizational factors transform deference to leader authority into unethical pro-organizational behavior. Management Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-08-2022-0602

Cocking, D. (2025). Authority, being educible, and the obedience fallacy. The Monist. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onaf009

Constant, A., & Otterbach, S. (2011). Work hours constraints: Impacts and policy implications. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:154471119

Dubnick, M. J., & Justice, J. B. (2014). Barnard’s regret. Public Integrity, 16(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922160202

Fives, A. (2022). Authority, excluded reasons and moral conflict. Disputatio, 14(67), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2022-0017

Fives, A. (2024). The dilemma of authority. Philosophia, 52(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-024-00715-7

H. O., E., I., O., K. F., A., & L. O., N. (2021). Methods of estimating correlation coefficients in the presence of influential outlier(s). African Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Studies, 4(3), 157–185. https://doi.org/10.52589/AJMSS-LLNZXUOZ

Ibrahim, & Marianingrum, D., Tang, R. G. (2023). Hubungan jam kerja dengan tingkat kejadian hipertensi pada pegawai di PT. X Kabupaten Berau Kalimantan Timur. Zona Kedokteran, 12(1), 306–311. https://doi.org/10.37776/zked.v13i1.1150

Inayatillah, I. (2015). Dampak penerapan absen sidik jari (finger print) terhadap PNS perempuan di lingkup UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:217809006

Irchamillah, I., & Hendriani, W. (2023). Pengaturan kerja fleksibel (FWA) dan implikasinya: Tinjauan literatur sistematis. Jurnal Psikologi: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan, 10(2), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.35891/jip.v10i2.3721

Khan, H., & Singh, N. (2024). Chester Barnard’s Functions of the Executive in the 21st century: A critical review. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5, 2522–2525. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i6.2024.5661

Khayroiyah, S., Melati, I., Amelia, F., Hartanti, F., & Fatmawati, P. A. (2025). Tahapan sampling dalam penelitian ilmiah pada pembelajaran metodologi penelitian. Education Achievement: Journal of Science and Research. https://doi.org/10.51178/jsr.v6i2.2673

Khorfan, R., Yuce, T. K., Love, R., Yang, A. D., Chung, J. W., Hoyt, D. B., Lewis, F. R., & Bilimoria, K. Y. (2020). Cumulative effect of flexible duty-hour policies on resident outcomes: Long-term follow-up results from the FIRST Trial. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003802

Kirana, S. Z., & Hendriani, W. (2024). Flexible working arrangement sebagai kiblat metode kerja di Asia: Tinjauan literatur sistematis. Psyche 165 Journal, 17(4), 348–353. https://doi.org/10.35134/jpsy165.v17i4.439

Kukuh Yulianto, & Dety Mulyanti. (2023). Pengaruh jam kerja terhadap jam absensi dan produktivitas karyawan: Studi kasus salah satu karyawan PT. XYZ. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Akuntansi, 29(1), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.59725/ema.v29i1.64

Kurniawan, S. D., & Huda, M. (2021). Analisis keseimbangan antara kehidupan dan waktu kerja fleksibel selama pandemi Covid-19 menggunakan SMART-PLS. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:245750552

Mo, S., Song, Y., Fang, Y., Wang, M., Shi, J., Jin, W., & Zhao, X. (2023). Performance goal orientation and unethical pro-organizational behavior: A moderated mediation model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(18), 3431–3463. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2125819

Neuber, T., & Neuber, T. (2021). ECON Tribute Discussion Paper No. 116: Egocentric norm adoption. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.5774-1.0

Oktaviana, L. (2025). Pengaruh fleksibilitas jam kerja dan dukungan atasan terhadap work life balance karyawan remote. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen West Science. https://doi.org/10.58812/jbmws.v4i03.2552

Pelligra, V., Reggiani, T., & Zizzo, D. J. (2020). Responding to (un)reasonable requests by an authority. Theory and Decision, 89(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-020-09758-0

Pramono, T. S. (2020). Analisis faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh pada produktivitas kerja karyawan. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan. https://doi.org/10.31933/jimt.v1i6.216

Ramadani, K. D. (2021). Hubungan jam kerja dan kesehatan pekerja di Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.29406/jkmk.v8i1.2638

Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang. Departemen Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia.

Roman, A., Haleblian, J. M., & Raveendran, M. (2021). Authority acceptance and team performance: Insights from the English Premier League. Academy of Management Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2021.12177abstract

Sáenz-Royo, C., & Lozano-Rojo, Á. (2023). Authoritarianism versus participation in innovation decisions. Technovation, 124, 102741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102741

Saputro, E. (2023). Sistem kerja fleksibel: Tempat kerja dan/atau waktu kerja yang fleksibel (tinjauan naratif). Cendekia Niaga, 7(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.52391/jcn.v7i2.779

Sevel, M. (2021). Practical authority and self-knowledge. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3765439

Valentinov, V., & Roth, S. (2021). Chester Barnard’s systems-theoretic approach to organisation theory: A reconstruction. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 28(5), 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2021.1877759

Valentinov, V., & Roth, S. (2022). Chester Barnard’s theory of the firm: An institutionalist view. Journal of Economic Issues, 56(3), 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2022.2079932

Vinokurov, V. A. (2024). Personal interest in Russian law: Issues of conceptualization. Общество: Политика, Экономика, Право. https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2024.7.14

Walsh, A. P., & Brady, M. (2019). Chester Barnard revisited: Spontaneous orders and the firm. Journal of Institutional Economics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137419000365

Weaver, M. D., Landrigan, C. P., Sullivan, J. P., O’Brien, C. S., Qadri, S., Viyaran, N. C., Wang, W., Vetter, C., Czeisler, C. A., & Barger, L. K. (2020). The association between resident physician work hour regulations and physician safety and health. The American Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.12.053

Wong, I. S., Quay, B., Irvin, E., & Belzer, M. H. (2022). Describing economic benefits and costs of nonstandard work hours: A scoping review. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 65(11), 926–939. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23302

Wylie, C. (2008). The kingdom of individuals: An essay on self-respect and social obligation. American Ethnologist, 24, 218–219. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1997.24.1.218.2

Zai, A., Hidayat Waruwu, M., Telaumbanua, E., & Beniah Ndraha, A. (2024). Analisis resistensi pegawai dalam kebijakan jam kerja di Dinas Pendidikan Kota Gunungsitoli. Journal of Accounting and Finance Management, 5(4), 734–743. https://doi.org/10.38035/jafm.v5i4.756