Tinjauan Penerapan Prosedur Audit Atas Utang Usaha pada PT XYZ Oleh KAP Ramli & Rekan

Authors

  • Adinda Athaya Salwa Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • Khaila Putri Amalia Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • Shafira Elyana Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • Susan Leoni Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • Eka Merdekawati Institut Pertanian Bogor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/jieap.v2i4.1832

Keywords:

Accounts Payable Audit, Audit Procedures, Audit Assertions, Internal Control, Materiality

Abstract

This study aims to examine the implementation of audit procedures on accounts payable at PT XYZ by KAP Ramli & Rekan, with a focus on compliance with Auditing Standards and effectiveness in detecting material misstatements. Accounts payable are a key component of financial statements representing the company’s obligations to suppliers, requiring accurate presentation for assessing liquidity and capital structure. The study applies a descriptive qualitative method, collecting primary data through interviews with audit staff at KAP Ramli & Rekan and secondary data from relevant literature. The findings show that the audit procedures comply with professional standards, covering comprehensive stages including engagement acceptance, audit planning, risk and materiality assessment, and substantive testing. The planning process incorporates the COSO framework for evaluating internal control, establishes audit objectives based on the five management assertions, and utilizes ATLAS software and Microsoft Excel. KAP Ramli & Rekan apply control testing and substantive procedures, including external confirmations, inspection of supporting documents, review of aging payables, and subsequent payment testing. Risk assessment indicates low inherent and control risks, while detection risk is mitigated through substantive procedures. Overall Materiality is set at 60% of revenue and profit before tax, Performance Materiality at 3% of Overall Materiality, and Threshold Materiality at 3% of Performance Materiality. The study concludes that the audit procedures implemented by KAP Ramli & Rekan align with applicable Auditing Standards and are effective in addressing audit risks related to accounts payable. The implications highlight the importance of enhancing audit quality practices, particularly the effectiveness of planning and internal control evaluation in accounts payable audits.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aditya, B., & Meita, I. (2024). Prosedur audit utang usaha oleh KAP Heliantono & Rekan pada PT SSP dan PT HRR. Jurnal Mahasiswa Bina Insani, 9(1), 31–40.

Agoes, S. (2019). Auditing: Petunjuk praktis pemeriksaan akuntan oleh akuntan publik (Buku 2, Cetakan ke-3). Salemba Empat.

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2017). Auditing and assurance services: An integrated approach. Pearson.

Daewoo, A. (2024). Efektivitas audit tool and linked archived system (ATLAS) dalam menganalisis kecurangan pada laporan keuangan. EKONOMIKA45: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi Bisnis, Kewirausahaan, 11(2), 576–592. https://doi.org/10.30640/ekonomika45.v11i2.2555

Endaryono, B. T., Prasetyo, A., & Baliarto, S. (2024). Peran penting tujuan pengauditan dan asersi manajemen di perusahaan. Jurnal GICI: Jurnal Keuangan dan Bisnis, 16(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.58890/jkb.v16i1.259

IAPI. (2021). Standar audit (SA) 230 (Revisi 2021): Dokumentasi audit. Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia.

IAPI. (2021). Standar audit (SA) 300 (Revisi 2021): Perencanaan suatu audit atas laporan keuangan. Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia.

IAPI. (2021). Standar audit (SA) 500 & SA 330 (Revisi 2021): Prosedur audit dan bukti audit. Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia.

IAPI. (2024). Pendokumentasian kertas kerja audit untuk memitigasi risiko temuan signifikan dalam pemeriksaan. https://iapi.or.id/

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2018). International standard on auditing (ISA) 315: Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement. IFAC.

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2018). International standard on auditing (ISA) 330: The auditor’s responses to assessed risks. IFAC.

Jusup, A. H. (2014). Auditing (Edisi ke-2). STIE YKPN.

Saputra, M. A., & Novita. (2023). Sistem pengendalian internal berdasarkan COSO framework pada perusahaan konstruksi. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Politala, 6(1), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.34128/jra.v6i1.148

Tampubolon, R. B. D. P., Merdekawati, E., & Rahmani, H. F. (2025). Auditing: Materi dan bank soal. PT Penerbit IPB Press.

Tuanakotta, T. M. (2015). Audit berbasis risiko: Pendekatan risiko bisnis pada audit laporan keuangan. Salemba Empat.

Victoria Go, I. (2015). Analisis penerimaan perikatan audit pada KAP Hendrawinata Eddy Siddharta & Tanzil Jakarta (Tesis magister). Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.

Winarta, W., & Kuntadi, C. (2022). Literature review: The effect of company size, company growth, and company liquidity on going concern audit opinion. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting (DIJEFA), 3(4), 430–437. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijefa.v3i4

Downloads

Published

2025-12-16

How to Cite

Adinda Athaya Salwa, Khaila Putri Amalia, Shafira Elyana, Susan Leoni, & Eka Merdekawati. (2025). Tinjauan Penerapan Prosedur Audit Atas Utang Usaha pada PT XYZ Oleh KAP Ramli & Rekan. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, Akuntansi, Dan Pajak, 2(4), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.61132/jieap.v2i4.1832