Pengalaman Auditor, Independensi, Skeptisisme Profesional, Time Pressure, dan Red Flags Pengaruhi Kemampuan Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan

(Studi Kasus pada Auditor di Kantor Akuntan Publik Wilayah Tangerang Selatan)

Authors

  • Canggah Wiarta Universitas Budi Luhur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/jieap.v2i1.876

Keywords:

Auditor Ability, Auditor Experience, Independence, Professional Skepticism, Time Pressure

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of auditor experience, independence, professional skepticism, time pressure, and red flags on the auditor's ability to detect financial statement fraud in the Public Accounting Firm (KAP) in the South Tangerang region. Data was collected through the distribution of questionnaires using the purposive sampling method, with a sample of 45 auditors from four KAPs. Data analysis was carried out using multiple linear regression with the help of SPSS software version 21 and Microsoft Excel 2021. The results showed that professional skepticism had a significant negative effect on the auditor's ability to detect fraud. On the contrary, auditor experience and red flags have a significant positive influence on auditor ability. Meanwhile, independence and time pressure do not have a significant influence on the auditor's ability to detect financial statement fraud.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achmad, M. Z., & Galib, M. R. (2022). Pengaruh red flags, independensi, dan skeptisisme profesional terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 14(2), 75-89.

Agoestina Mappadang. (2023). Detecting fraud in financial statements through the fraud triangle model: The case of Indonesia. Volume 8, Issue 2.

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2014). Auditing and assurance services: An integrated approach (15th ed.). Pearson.

Ashton, R. H. (1991). Experience and error frequency knowledge as potential determinants of audit expertise. The Accounting Review, 66(2), 218–239.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) Indonesia. (2020). Fraud examination and prevention. Jakarta: ACFE Indonesia.

Bonner, S. E., & Lewis, B. L. (1990). Determinants of auditor expertise. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(3), 1–20.

Boynton, W. C., & Johnson, R. N. (2006). Modern auditing: Assurance services and the integrity of financial reporting (8th ed.). Wiley.

Carpenter, T. D., Durtschi, C., & Gaynor, L. M. (2011). The incremental benefits of a forensic accounting course on skepticism and fraud-related judgments. Issues in Accounting Education, 26(1), 1–21.

Dasila, D., & Hajering, H. (2019). Pengaruh pengalaman audit terhadap pendeteksian kecurangan. Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 8(1), 50–65.

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor independence, "low balling," and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 113–127.

Digdowiseiso, K., & Permana, B. (2022). Hubungan independensi dan skeptisisme profesional terhadap deteksi fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer, 10(2), 34-48. https://ejournal.unair.ac.id

Digdowiseiso, K., Setiawan, A., & Wijaya, M. (2022). Independensi dan skeptisme profesional auditor dalam mendeteksi fraud.

Fatika Suci, A., et al. (2022). Pengaruh red flags, kompetensi auditor, dan skeptisme profesional terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia, 17(3), 120-135.

Fikriyah, N. H., & Kuntadi, C. (2024). Pengaruh pengalaman audit terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Audit Indonesia, 12(3), 40–55.

Fitria, M., & Ratnaningsih, S. (2022). Pengaruh pengalaman audit, skeptisme, dan tekanan waktu terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia, 12(4), 60-72.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Hurt, M. R., & Peuranda, D. (2020). Skeptisme profesional auditor dalam konteks deteksi fraud. Journal of Forensic Accounting, 6(1), 48-62. https://journals.sagepub.com

Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H. L., Earley, C. E., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). Research on auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(1), 45–97.

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2009). International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 240: The auditor’s responsibilities relating to fraud in an audit of financial statements.

Irawati, D., & Setiawan, D. (2020). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional dan independensi terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 11(2), 312–323. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Akuntansi, 19(1), 45-60.

Knapp, C. A. (1985). Audit conflict: An empirical study of the perceived ability of auditors to resist management pressure. The Accounting Review, 60(2), 202–211.

Krisnawati, S., et al. (2023). Pengaruh independensi, keahlian, dan pengalaman audit terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Auditing, 20(1), 40-55.

Larasati, R. D., & Puspitasari, M. (2022). Pengaruh masa jabatan dan jumlah penugasan terhadap deteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Auditing, 14(1), 15-28. https://journal.uii.ac.id/

Lestari, D. (2023). Time pressure dan akurasi deteksi fraud oleh auditor. Jurnal Akuntansi Modern, 17(3), 72-85. https://jurnal.unpad.ac.id

Lestari, I. R. (2023). Pengaruh red flags, time pressure, dan audit tenure terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan dan Bisnis, 11(2), 45-70.

Meidiyustiani, R., & Lestari, I. R. (2021). Pengaruh audit tenure, red flags, dan time pressure terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 18(2), 55-70.

Messier, W. F., Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2016). Auditing and assurance services: A systematic approach (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Mulford, C. W., & Comiskey, E. E. (2002). The financial numbers game: Detecting creative accounting practices. Wiley.

Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1–34.

Pratama, B. D., et al. (2019). Pengaruh red flags dan whistleblowing system terhadap kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Akuntansi, 8(2), 90-105.

Pratiwi, N. K., & Rohman, M. (2021). Pengaruh independensi, skeptisme profesional, dan pengalaman audit terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 15(3), 200-215.

Resnawaty, T., & Kurniansyah, D. (2021). Pengaruh pengalaman dan pelatihan terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 5(2), 101-112. https://e-journal.trisakti.ac.id

Sari, N. R., & Handayani, D. (2024). Peningkatan sikap skeptisme profesional dalam audit: Pengaruh pelatihan dan pengalaman. Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 19(1), 12-27. https://journal.binus.ac.id/

Sinaga, R., et al. (2024). Pengaruh skeptisme profesional, independensi, dan pengalaman auditor terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Publik, 12(1), 35-50.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukrisno, A. (2012). Auditing: Petunjuk praktis pemeriksaan akuntan oleh akuntan publik. Salemba Empat.

Sutisman, D., et al. (2023). Pengaruh pemahaman kode etik, time pressure, dan independensi terhadap kemampuan auditor mendeteksi kecurangan dengan skeptisme sebagai variabel moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Etika Bisnis, 21(3), 60-85.

Sutisman, S., & Yulianti, R. (2023). Independensi auditor dan hubungannya dengan kualitas audit. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 16(3), 99-112. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id

Yuniati, N. (2022). Pengaruh skeptisme profesional, independensi, dan pengalaman auditor terhadap tanggung jawab auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia, 14(1), 50-65.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-05

How to Cite

Canggah Wiarta. (2025). Pengalaman Auditor, Independensi, Skeptisisme Profesional, Time Pressure, dan Red Flags Pengaruhi Kemampuan Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan : (Studi Kasus pada Auditor di Kantor Akuntan Publik Wilayah Tangerang Selatan). Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, Akuntansi, Dan Pajak, 2(1), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.61132/jieap.v2i1.876