Perbandingan Metode IRR (Internal Rate of Return) dan Payback Period dalam Capital Budgeting pada PT. Pertamina (Persero)

Hana Maulida; Ratu Mutiara Juliyanti; Siti Wiwiarsih; Siti Nurfadia; Bambang Nur Indrawan; Mukhlishotul Jannah

doi:10.61132/jiesa.v2i4.1202

Authors

Hana Maulida Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
Ratu Mutiara Juliyanti Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
Siti Wiwiarsih Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
Siti Nurfadia Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
Bambang Nur Indrawan Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
Mukhlishotul Jannah Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/jiesa.v2i4.1202

Keywords:

Capital Budgeting, Feasibility, Investment, Payback Period, PT Pertamina

Abstract

This study reviews the comparison between two popular methods in capital budgeting analysis, namely Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Payback Period (PP), applied in the investment decision-making process at PT Pertamina (Persero). As a state-owned company in the energy sector that runs various important projects, Pertamina needs to evaluate investment feasibility efficiently. IRR is used to assess the effectiveness of long-term investments by taking into account all cash flows as well as the time value of money, while PP emphasizes more on how quickly the initial capital can be returned. This article uses a literature study method with a descriptive-qualitative approach to explore the advantages and disadvantages of each method. The results of the discussion show that IRR provides a more precise picture of long-term investment returns, while PP is useful for identifying projects that quickly return capital. Nonetheless, the use of each method alone is not comprehensive enough. Therefore, it is recommended that Pertamina integrate IRR and PP with other approaches such as Net Present Value (NPV) and sensitivity analysis to support more comprehensive and strategic investment decisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2017). Principles of corporate finance (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Christine, F. T., Suhendra, E., & Sunarto. (2023). Analisis capital budgeting dalam pengambilan keputusan investasi. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 12(1), 45–56.

CNN Indonesia. (2023, Agustus 25). Pengertian internal rate of return: Fungsi, rumus, dan contohnya. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com

Dewi, A. R., & Putra, D. I. (2020). Pengaruh metode capital budgeting terhadap keputusan investasi pada perusahaan manufaktur. Jurnal Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 7(2), 112–120.

Liman, R. M., & Suarjaya, A. A. G. (2017). Studi kelayakan investasi pendirian SPBU di Monangmaning. E-Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Udayana, 6(10), 5489–5523.

Malonda, H. H. V. (2014). Analisis investasi proyek pembangunan SPPBE di Kab. Lombok Timur – NTB (Tesis, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya).

Mekari. (2025, Mei 5). Pengertian payback period: Rumus, cara menghitung & contoh. Mekari. https://mekari.com/blog/pengertian-payback-period/

Nugroho, D. A., & Prasetyo, T. (2021). Evaluasi kelayakan investasi menggunakan metode NPV, IRR, dan Payback Period. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia, 5(1), 55–66.

Prasetya, A. D. (2021). Pengaruh manajemen keuangan terhadap efektivitas keputusan investasi pada BUMN. Jurnal Riset Manajemen dan Keuangan, 9(3), 233–240.

PT Pertamina (Persero). (2024). Laporan keuangan konsolidasian tahun buku 2023. PT Pertamina (Persero).

Sari, M., & Kurniawan, F. (2022). Studi kasus penggunaan metode IRR dalam pengambilan keputusan investasi. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, 3(1), 45–52.

Wijayanti, R. (2022). Analisis capital budgeting proyek pembangunan Pertamina Energy Tower (Tesis, Universitas Indonesia, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis).

Yuliana, E. (2019). Analisis kelayakan investasi proyek pembangunan gudang dengan pendekatan capital budgeting. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 14(2), 101–110.