Analisis Pilihan Konsumen Terhadap Barang Substitusi dan Komplementer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/jeap.v1i4.725Keywords:
Consumer behavior, substitute goods, complementary goodsAbstract
This study aims to analyze consumer behavior in choosing substitute and complementary goods. The research was conducted on consumers in traditional markets, namely Petisah Market and Simpang Limun Market, as well as modern markets, namely Sun Plaza and Plaza Medan Fair in Medan City. The research sample consisted of 200 respondents selected using a purposive sampling method. The primary research instrument was a structured questionnaire designed with a five-point Likert scale to measure respondents' perceptions of factors influencing their choices, such as the price of goods. The data were analyzed using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitative analysis involved descriptive statistics to describe the characteristics of respondents and data distribution. The analysis results indicate that consumers tend to choose substitute goods when the price of primary goods increases. Furthermore, price significantly influences purchasing decisions for both substitute and complementary goods. Consumers are more sensitive to price changes in substitute goods due to their tendency to seek cheaper alternatives. In contrast, for complementary goods, an increase in the price of primary goods tends to reduce the demand for complementary goods, as they are often used together. The implications of this study suggest that appropriate pricing strategies can optimize the demand for substitute goods, while careful consideration is needed when setting prices for complementary goods.
Downloads
References
Chen, L., & Wang, J. (2020). Consumer behavior in modern retail environments: The role of perceived value and brand quality. Journal of Retail Marketing, 45(3), 332-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrm.2020.03.015
Hidayat, R. (2021). The impact of health awareness on consumer preference for substitutes and complements. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 39(2), 256-265. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.2305
Kirana, N. (2018). The role of social norms in consumer behavior: A case study on complementary products. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), 682-690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243718753673
Kumar, A. (2019). Income elasticity and substitution effects in low-income consumer behavior. International Review of Economics, 27(4), 520-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-019-0322-7
Mankiw, N. G. (2014). Principles of Economics (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Muqorobin, F. (2019). Price sensitivity and consumer choices in substitution and complementary products: A study on Indonesian consumers. International Journal of Economics and Business Studies, 12(1), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.22355/ijebs.2019.01.09
Parkin, M. (2016). Microeconomics (11th ed.). Pearson Education.
Siregar, E. (2020). The effect of income on consumer behavior towards complementary and substitute products in Indonesia. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2789543
Smith, A., & Taylor, J. (2021). Complementary goods and consumer choice: The influence of culture and necessity. Journal of Consumer Studies, 18(2), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17412921.2021.112435
Syafitri, A. (2022). Digital transformation in consumer behavior: The shift in purchasing patterns for substitutes and complements. International Journal of Digital Marketing, 7(3), 240-250. https://doi.org/10.22334/ijdm.2022.03.12
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntansi, dan Perpajakan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.